Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
More than 2.5 billion people worldwide still do not have access to clean cooking ; approximately 30% of global greenhouse emissions from forest degradation are derived from woodfuel harvest, and, in total, emissions from nonrenewable wood fuels for cooking amount to 1 GtCO2 per year, about 2% of global emissions.
These statistics demonstrate the magnitude of a small, individual activity and its contribution to the larger-scale worsening of the climate crisis. In the face of this emergency, various solutions have been offered to tackle a growing carbon footprint. For example, carbon reduction is the process where an organization directly reduces greenhouse gas emissions through efficiency.
The WHO defines clean cooking as the use of clean fuels and technologies that attain the fine particulate matter
(PM2.5 ) and carbon monoxide (CO) levels recommended. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) classifies cookstoves into tiers ranked from 0 (lowest performing) to 5 (highest performing) based on five characteristics: thermal efficiency, CO2 emissions, PM2.5 emissions, safety, and durability.
Tiers 0 and 1 constitute the basic, traditional, solid-fuel-based stoves. Tiers 2–4 are considered improved clean cookstoves, such as highly efficient coal stoves, natural gasifier stoves, and LPG stoves, and Tier 5 represents cookstoves that use clean fuels. According to the Clean Cooking Alliance, clean cooking solutions are characterized by solutions that achieve ISO Tier 4 for PM2.5 emissions and Tier 5 for carbon monoxide emissions. On the other hand, improved cooking solutions are solutions that are cleaner or more efficient than the baseline technology/fuel combination, and can be more efficient without being cleaned.4 It is important to note that these a stove cannot be allocated a tier; instead, they are meant to be kept separate to provide flexibility for governments and organizations to set different goals, for example, a stove can be “tier 3 for efficiency, tier 2 for indoor emissions, tier 3 for total emissions, and tier 4 for safety.”5
Furthermore, the World Bank’s Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) has developed and applied a comprehensive way of measuring progress toward access to modern cooking energy for all. Its broadened, contextual definition of access, coined Modern Energy Cooking Services (MECS), draws on the approach of the World Bank’s Multi-Tier Framework (MTF) for cooking, which offers a standard tool for integrating holistic criteria on users’ needs and preferences into the measurement of access; its six measurement attributes are exposure, efficiency, convenience, safety, affordability, availability, and improved cooking services.
Cookstoves can be tested through the following methods:
- Water Boiling Test (WBT),
- Controlled Cooking Test (CCT),
- Kitchen Performance Test (KPT)
- Stove Use Monitors (SUM
Using the Multi-Tier Framework mentioned above, based on a 71-country sample of 5.3 billion people representing 90% of lower and lower-middle-income countries, a report found that “4 billion people lack the ability to cook efficiently, cleanly, conveniently, reliably, safely, affordably. Sub-Saharan Africa has the smallest share of people with access to MECS, at 10 percent, while Latin America and the Caribbean and East Asia have the highest shares, at 56 percent and 36 percent, respectively”. The population growth in sub-Saharan Africa continues to surpass the number of people with access to clean cooking, resulting in a stagnating ‘access deficit’ that has even doubled since 1990, reaching a total of 923 million people in 2020. This highlights an obstacle to progress in the clean cooking initiative and raises other issues such as the lack of funding.
The level of funding and investment in the clean cooking sector had not matched the global magnitude of the challenge, hovering around US$130 million, well below the US$4.5 billion that was required annually by 2020 to scale clean cooking to the 2.4 billion people who still depend on polluting fuels. Additionally, according to a report completed by the World Bank Group, the complexity and fragmentation of the cooking ecosystem, both through supply and demand generation, has been identified as another obstacle that struggles with the achievement of economies of scale. In the Sub-Saharan region, for example, 15 alternative biofuel businesses (e.g., ethanol and pellets)—less than 18 percent of the estimated active number—consistently supply more than 5,000 households with cooking fuel; just 7 businesses (less than 8 percent) reach over 20,000 households, while only 1 claims to reach more than 100,000 customers regularly (2017 figures).
Another factor identified within this report is the lack of coordination within and between institutions in country contexts that have skewed the trajectory of cooking interventions from becoming high-impact policy priorities. In Sub-Saharan Africa, multiple countries have experienced a decline of more than 50% in financing commitments where financing could have the most impact. This problem is compounded by the complex and multi-sectoral nature of cooking policy and initiatives, as comprehensive solutions require the involvement of a variety of stakeholders from energy, health, climate, industry, finance, rural and urban development, gender, and social protection.
Various reports have recommended the involvement of private investors and entrepreneurs to drive targeted seed and growth capital toward supply-side innovators and first-movers, particularly those advancing a cooking-utility model that considers household needs holistically, in addition to pursuing blended finance commitments from donors and development institutions to aid expand the leverage available for investing in emerging and best-in-class business models.
There are numerous reasons why clean cooking is vital, given its intersection with human health, the environment, and gender. For example, the emissions from non-renewable wood fuels from cooking include both CO2 and short-lived pollutants like black carbon, which have a warming impact on the climate that is up to 1,500 times as strong as that of CO2 . At the same time, the transition from traditional cookstoves produces radical improvements to health, safety, and economic security for women, who typically conduct 91% of the work to obtain fuel and cook, and who account for over 60% of all premature deaths from household air pollution. Other co-benefits of clean cooking for the climate, nature, and communities include the reduction of direct emissions of climate pollutants, avoiding emissions from forest degradation, enabling carbon removal by supporting regeneration and reforestation, improving clean air, and reducing the negative health impacts of air pollution.
Please reach us at team@greenpeople.earth if you cannot find an answer to your question.
Green People | Green Earth
Copyright © 2024 www.greenpeople.earth - All Rights Reserved.